The administrative law system handles all issues related to administrative hearings. Generally, this court system is distinct from the criminal and civil courts within a jurisdiction. As such, there are different rules and procedures than the average court. Use this guide to get a better understanding of administrative hearings.
Some Of the Differences
As noted, the administrative law system works a little differently. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) takes the place of a judge. In addition, administrative law cases are usually heard by the ALJ alone. This means that there are no jury trials. These are the main distinguishing factors.
The Basic Process
Administrative hearings in Chicago follow a similar format. These hearings arise when one party has a dispute and requests the hearing. Next, all the interested parties are notified of the right to attend the hearing. Prior to the hearing, there will be a pre-hearing conference to negotiate different terms. The parties may also enter into a settlement to avoid the hearing altogether.
The Hearing
Administrative hearings in Chicago are actually more complex than you might think at first. As such, it is important to have legal representation to help present a viable defense. In essence, the hearing is like a trial. Witnesses will give testimony, the ALJ will ask questions and legal arguments will be made. In the end, the ALJ will determine whether there is sufficient proof of the violation.
In summary, there are many different details to cover during the average administrative hearing. Due to this, it is best to avoid going at it alone.
For more assistance with administrative hearings, contact Johnson & Goldrich, Attorneys at Law by visiting the website.
